Back
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
B.PUGALENDHI
Muthulakshmi K. – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner Of Labour Authority Under Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dispute over permanent status orders and collateral writ petitions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. employees argue lawful appointments despite bypassing recruitment rules. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. backdoor entry invalidates permanent status claims; procedural compliance mandatory. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 4. autonomy does not excuse bypassing statutory recruitment procedures. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 5. fraud and collusion in appointments endanger co-operative institutions. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 6. orders of acl set aside; employees’ petitions dismissed. (Para 32) |
ORDER :
B. PUGALENDHI, J.
1.All these writ petitions are arising out of the orders dated 27.01.2021 passed by the 1st respondent / the Assistant commissioner of Labour (Enforcement), Dindigul / the Authority under the Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981, granting permanent status to the employees of the co-operative societies / writ petitioners in WP(MD)Nos.8192, 8201, 8209 and 8213 of 2021 (hereafter referred to as “employees”).
2.The employees, who were engaged by different co-operative societies have approac
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
