SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 41568

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.Srimathy, J
R.Santhoshkumar – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector – Respondent
WP(MD) NO. 9836 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: M/s.Colonel and Ganesan Associates
For the Respondents: Mr.S.Shanmugavel, Additional Government Pleader

The Court directs authorities to process land acquisition rewards and compensation within a stipulated time period in accordance with law.

Headnote:FIRST PARAGRAPH: Statute Analysis: The Court considered the petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a Writ of Mandamus to enforce the provisions of Sections 26 and 27 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Facts of the Case: The Petitioner, the owner of lands in survey fields at Sathiyamangalam Village, Kulithalai Taluk, Karur District, faced non-award of compensation despite the land acquisition process (notification dated 29.12.2021, enquiry conducted in 2023) for the Cauvery-Vaigai-Kundaru Linking Canal Project.

Findings of Court:
The Court acknowledged the delay in passing the award. SECOND PARAGRAPH:

Issues: The Court framed the issue around directing the respondents to pass an award and compensate the petitioner based on the guideline value and applicable circular.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court reasoned that the respondents must consider the petitioner's representation on merits in accordance with law, affording proper hearing to the petitioner and interested parties. LAST PARAGRAPH:

Result: The Writ Petition was disposed of with a direction to the respondents to enquire into the matter and provide compensation within sixteen weeks.

Table of Content
1. writ petition filed for compensation award in land acquisition (Para 1 , 2)
2. government confirms consideration on merits (Para 3)
3. directions issued for processing award within 16 weeks (Para 4)

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents herein to pass the final award and disburse the compensation to petitioner for the lands comprised in S.F. Nos. 194/5,194/6A, 194/4B and 135/4 situated at Sathiyamangalam Village, Kulithalai Taluk, Karur District in accordance with Sections 26 and 27 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 by taking into account the guideline value fixed by the Sub- Registrar, Kulithalai and the circular issued in M2/7304/2018 dated 16.10.2020 within stipulated time fixed by this Court.

ORDER

The present Writ Petition has been filed for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to pass the final award and disburse the compensation to petitioner for the lands comprised in S.F.Nos.194/5, 194/6A, 194/4B and 135/4 situated at Sathiyamangalam Village, Kulithalai Taluk, Karur District in accordance with Sections 26 and 27 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 by taking into account the guideline value fixed by the Sub-Registrar, Kulithalai and the circular issued in M2/7304/2018 dated 16.10.2020 within stipulated time fixed by this Court.

2. According to the petitioner, the petitioner is the rightful owners of the property in S.F. Nos.194/5, 194/6A, 194/4B and 135/4 situated at Sathiyamangalam Village, Kulithalai Taluk, Karur District. The Government proposed to acquire the subject property for the purpose of implementing the Cauvery-Vaigai-Kundaru Linking Canal Project. Thereafter, the Government issued notification under Section 13(1), dated 29.12.2021 and pursuant to the said notification, an enquiry was conducted as contemplated under the Act. In response to the said notice, the petitioner appeared for the enquiry and produced all the relevant documents before the respondents. He further submitted that MVG was fixed as Rs.130/- sq. ft., for the subject property at the time of issuance of the notification. Though the enquiry was completed in the year 2023 itself, even after the expiry of more than two and a half years, the first respondent has not passed the award in respect of the said land. Hence, the present Writ Petition.

3. The learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents submits that the petitioner's representation will be considered on its merits and in accordance with law.

4. Recording the above submission and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to enquire into the matter on the basis of the petitioner’s representation and to provide compensation as per petitioner's entitlement on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of sixteen weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The respondents 1 and 2 are directed to afford a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and any other interested parties who may be affected by such decision, before passing final orders. There shall be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top