Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P. Dhanabal, J
K. Sathish – Appellant
Versus
The State Rep by Deputy Superintendent of Police – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court consideration of incarceration period and co-accused bail. (Para 7) |
7. Taking into consideration the period of incarceration undergone by the appellants, the fact that there is no previous case is pending against them and also considering the fact that the co-accused have been enlarged on bail, this Court is inclined to allow the Criminal Appeals by setting aside the order, dated 17.03.2026 made in Crl.M.P.Nos.390 & 388 of 2021 on the file of the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Erode.
8. Accordingly, the Criminal Appeals are allowed and the order, dated 17.03.2026 made in Crl.M.P.Nos.390 & 388 of 2021 on the file of the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Erode is set aside. The appellants are ordered to be released on bail on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Erode, and on further condition that:
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
