SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 41618

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.K.Ilanthiraiyan, K.Rajasekar, JJ
Nagaraj – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu rep.through by its the Commissioner of Police Trichy, Trichy City – Respondent
H.C.P.(MD) No.631 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:Mr.S.M.Ramasiva|For the Respondents: Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor

Habeas corpus is not maintainable where the alleged detenue voluntarily travels abroad and confirms her position to the Court.

Headnote:First Paragraph: Article 226 of the Constitution of India empowers the Court to issue a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner filed this petition to secure his daughter, Madhu Balaa, who went missing since 30.04.2026.

Findings of Court:
The detenue is not in illegal detention of anybody, making the petition not maintainable. Second Paragraph: Whether or not the detenue is in illegal detention is the main issue.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that when the detenue appears before the Court through Video Conferencing and confirms she went abroad without informing her father, the petition is not maintainable. Last Paragraph: The petition is dismissed.

Table of Content
1. background and prayer for habeas corpus. (Para 1 , 2)
2. detenue confirmation and court interaction. (Para 3 , 4)

[Order of the Court was made by G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.]

The petitioner has filed this habeas corpus petition seeking a direction to the respondents to secure his daughter, namely, Madhu Balaa, aged about 32 years, produce her before this Court and set her at liberty.

2. The petitioner got married and blessed with two daughters, of whom, the elder daughter (detenue) got married with one Balakrishnan and thereafter, she went abroad. She also blessed with two children. Thereafter, she is found missing from her house from 30.04.2026 onwards. Hence, her father / petitioner herein lodged a complaint before the respondent – Police. However, her husband did not lodge any complaint. Based on the complaint lodged by the petitioner herein, the respondent – Police registered a case in Crime No.166 of 2026, under Woman Missing and it is pending for investigation. While pending investigation, the petitioner has filed this habeas corpus petition.

3. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents, on instructions, submitted that the detenue went abroad without informing her father. However, after a period of sometimes, she informed to her father. Even then, the petitioner has filed this habeas corpus petition suppressing the above facts.

4. The detenue appeared before this Court through Video Conferencing. This Court interacted with the detenue. The interaction with the detenue reveals that the detenue went abroad without informing her father. However, subsequently, she informed the same with her father. In such circumstances, this Court is of the considered view that the detenue is not in illegal detention of anybody. Hence, this habeas corpus petition is not maintainable.

5. Accordingly, this habeas corpus petition is dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top