SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 41619

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.K. Ilanthiraiyan, K. Rajasekar, JJ
Selvi – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamilnadu rep – Respondent
H.C.P.(MD) No.640 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.S.Pugalendhi
For the Respondents: Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor for R1 & R2

A habeas corpus petition is not maintainable when the person is not in illegal detention.

Headnote:The petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of habeas corpus to produce and set at liberty the petitioner's daughter alleged to be missing. The Court considered the submission that the detenue appeared before the police voluntarily and was not in illegal detention. The Court held that the petition was not maintainable as the detenue was not found to be in illegal custody. The second respondent was directed to complete the investigation in Crime No.276 of 2026 and file a final report before the jurisdictional court.

Table of Content
1. filing of habeas corpus petition after registering missing person case. (Para 1 , 2)
2. voluntary appearance negates illegal detention claim. (Para 3 , 4)

[Order of the Court was made by G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.]

The petitioner has filed this habeas corpus petition seeking a direction to the respondents 1 & 2 to secure her daughter, namely, Mugitha, aged about 20 years, produce her before this Court and set her at liberty.

2. The petitioner herein is the mother of the detenue. The petitioner lodged a complaint before the respondent – Police alleging that her daughter Mugitha is found missing from 02.05.2026 onwards. On receipt of the said complaint, the respondent – Police registered a case in Crime No.276 of 2026 under “Woman Missing” and it is pending for investigation. While pending investigation, the petitioner has filed this habeas corpus petition.

3. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents 1 & 2, on instructions, submitted that the detenue herself on her own volition has appeared before the second respondent and she is not in illegal detention on the hands of the third respondent.

4. In view of the above submission, this Court is of the view that the detenue is not in illegal detention of the third respondent and hence, this habeas corpus petition is not maintainable.

5. Accordingly, this habeas corpus petition is dismissed.

However, the second respondent is directed to complete the investigation in Crime No.276 of 2026 and file the final report before the jurisdictional Court in accordance with law.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top