SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 41620

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.K. Ilanthiraiyan, K. Rajasekar, JJ
Devi – Appellant
Versus
The State of TamilNadu rep by – Respondent
H.C.P.(MD) No.641 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.K.Anbuchelvam
For the Respondents: Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor

Habeas corpus is not maintainable where the detenu is not shown to be in illegal detention.

Headnote:Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner sought a writ of habeas corpus directing the respondents to produce her husband, the detenu, and set him at liberty. The detenu's wife filed the petition following the registration of a man-missing case by the police. In view of the submission that the detenu had eloped and was not in illegal detention of anybody, the Court held that the habeas corpus petition is not maintainable. The Court framed the issue as whether the detenu was in illegal detention, warranting the issue of a writ of habeas corpus. The ratio decidendi is that for a habeas corpus petition to be maintainable, the detenu must be shown as being held in illegal detention by the respondents. The habeas corpus petition is dismissed, with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Family Court for appropriate relief if so advised.

Table of Content
1. habeas corpus petition dismissed as detenu not in illegal detention (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)

[Order of the Court was made by G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.]

The petitioner has filed this habeas corpus petition seeking a direction to the respondents to secure her husband, namely, Nandhakumar, aged about 31 years, produce him before this Court and set him at liberty.

2. The petitioner herein is the wife of the detenu. The petitioner herein lodged a complaint before the respondent – Police alleging that her husband is found missing from 27.04.2026. On receipt of the said complaint, the respondent – Police registered a case in Crime No.56 of 2026 under Man Missing and it is pending for investigation. While pending investigation, the petitioner has filed this habeas corpus petition.

3. Learned Additional Public Prosecution appearing for the respondents, on instructions, submitted that the petitioner's husband eloped with one Veerammal and now, they are settled in Andhra Pradesh. Therefore, the petitioner is not in illegal detention of anybody.

4. In view of the above submission of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this Court is of the view that the detenu is not in illegal detention of anybody. Hence, this habeas corpus petition is not maintainable.

5. Accordingly, this habeas corpus petition is dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top