SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 41621

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.K. Ilanthiraiyan, K. Rajasekar, JJ
R.Prabhu – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
H.C.P.(MD) No.646 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ms.Swetha
For the Respondents: Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor

A habeas corpus petition is not maintainable where there is no illegal detention and the child is in mother's custody.

Headnote:The petitioner sought a writ of habeas corpus for the return of his wife and minor son from alleged illegal detention by his wife's companion. The court observed that the wife is voluntarily residing with the third respondent and that the minor son remains in the mother's custody, which does not amount to illegal detention. The petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is therefore not maintainable. The petitioner has the remedy before the Family Court for custody issues.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks release of missing wife and child from alleged illegal custody (Para 1 , 2)
2. wife voluntarily lives with third party and minor son is with mother (Para 3)
3. no illegal detention, petition not maintainable but liberty to approach family court (Para 4)

[Order of the Court was made by G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.]

The petitioner has filed this habeas corpus petition seeking a direction to the respondents to secure his wife, namely, Malathi, aged about 32 years and son, namely, Kabish, aged about 2 years, produce them before this Court and set them at liberty.

2. The petitioner herein is the husband of the first detenue, namely, Malathi and father of the second detenu, namely, Kabish. The petitioner lodged a complaint before the respondent – Police alleging that his wife and child are found missing from 20.03.2026. On receipt of the said complaint, the respondent – Police registered a case in Crime No.143 of 2016.

3. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents 1 & 2, on instructions, submitted that the petitioner's wife has gone with the third respondent and she is living with him along with her children. In fact, on the earlier occasion, the petitioner's wife went along with the third respondent and on the petitioner's compulsion, she returned to the matrimonial home. Once again, she has gone along with the third respondent and now, she is living with him.

4. In view of the above submission of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this Court is of the view that the detenue is not in illegal detention of anybody. That apart, the minor son is with the custody of the mother and it does not amount to any illegal detention. Hence, this habeas corpus petition is not maintainable.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top