IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.K.Ramakrishnan, J
K. Periyasamy – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamilnadu – Respondent
W.P.Crl.(MD)No.2763 of 2026 and WMP Crl.(MD) No.670 of 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of representation rejection and impugned order. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments of both parties and undertakings offered. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. court direction to set aside impugned order and grant permission with conditions. (Para 4 , 5) |
O R D E R
The petitioner, who is the resident of South Malaiyadipatti, Rajapalayam, on behalf of the villagers, has submitted a representation before the second respondent police, for grant of permission to conduct festival at Thangamariyamman Temple from 12.05.2026 to 14.05.2026, along with ''Adal Padal programme'', however, the request of this petitioner for conducting ''Adal Padal programme'' was rejected by the second respondent, by the order impugned in this writ petition. Challenging the same, the present writ petition is filed.
2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that as a part of customary temple festival celebrations, the villagers have conducted the cultural programme for several years peacefully without any law and order problem. He further submits that no untoward incident was reported in the previous years. The petitioner also assures that the festival will be conducted in a peaceful manner, without any law and order problem. Therefore, he requests to set aside the impugned order and to issue a direction to the respondents to grant permission to conduct the festival along with cultural programme as scheduled.
3.Mr.S.Ravi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents submits that apprehending law and order problem, the representation of this petitioner for conducting ''Adal Padal Programme' was rejected, however, permission was granted to conduct the temple festival in a peaceful manner, with certain conditions.
4.Considering the submissions made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner and also considering the undertaking given by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to set aside the impugned order.
5.Accordingly, the order passed by the second respondent in Na.Ka.No. 164/R1PS/RJPM/2026 dated 07.05.2026 is hereby set aside and this writ petition is allowed with the following directions:-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.