Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.R.Swaminathan, V.Lakshminarayanan, JJ
Jothi – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. recovery of the subject matter renders the writ petition infructuous. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
(Order of the Court was made by G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.)
The petitioner is the mother of the detenue. The detenue appeared to have eloped with the third respondent. Hence, the Habeas Corpus Petition came to be filed.
2. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submitted that the girl has since been secured and handed over to the writ petitioner.
3. Hence, nothing survives for adjudication in this petition. Accordingly, the Habeas Corpus Petition is closed as infructuous.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
