Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.R.Swaminathan, V.Lakshminarayanan, JJ
Sellam – Appellant
Versus
Superintendent of Police – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. issuance of directions for police investigation in missing person cases. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
(Order of the Court was made by G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.)
Heard both sides.
2. The writ petitioner’s husband, Sembaiya, aged about 66 years was missing since 11.03.2026. Based on the petitioner’s complaint, the second respondent has registered a case in Crime No.90 of 2026. Since the petitioner’s husband remains untraced, the present Habeas Corpus Petition came to be filed.
3. We direct the first respondent to issue suitable instructions to the second respondent to take all possible steps to secure the missing individual.
With the above direction, the Habeas Corpus Petition stands disposed of.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
