IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Victoria Gowri, Senthilkumar, JJ
Radhakrishnan – Appellant
Versus
Chief Secretary to Government – Respondent
WP No. 19398 of 2026|WMP Nos. 20679 and 20680 OF 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. complaint regarding encroachment and lack of official response. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. duty of statutory bodies to dispose of representations. (Para 4) |
..Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 15th respondent to remove encroachment made by the 18th respondent in respect of the properties belonging to the 17th respondent temple and consequentially issue direction directing the 15th respondent to secure and safeguard all properties of 17th respondent temple by considering petitioners representation dated 18.02.2026 and 30.04.2026.
For Petitioner : Mr.J.Manikandan for Mr.R.Marudhachalamurthy For Respondents : Mr.N.R.R.Arun Natarajan Special Government Pleader – for R1 to R16
Order
(Order of the Court was made by L.Victoria Gowri J.)
This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the 15th respondent to remove encroachment made by the 18th respondent in respect of the properties belonging to the 17th respondent temple and consequentially issue direction directing the 15th respondent to secure and safeguard all properties of 17th respondent temple by considering petitioners representation dated 18.02.2026 and
30.04.2026.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the property belonging to the 18th respondent temple has been encroached by the 15th respondent and in order to safeguard the properties of the temple, the petitioner has sent a representation dated 18.02.2026 and 30.04.2026, and no action has been taken so far.
3. Learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 16 submits that though the classification of land stands as ‘grazing lands’, vide G.O. (MD) No.2 dated 03.01.1995 and G.O.(MD) No.2 dated 26.02.2021, the property has already been leased out in favour of the 18th respondent.
4. It is needless to state that, whenever a representation is made to the statutory authorities, it is the duty of the authorities to dispose of the same within a limited period and non-consideration of the representation would amount to dereliction of duty.
5. Considering the nature of relief sought for in the present writ petition, the
15th respondent is directed to consider the petitioner's representations dated 18.02.2026 and 30.04.2026 and pass appropriate orders within a period of four (4)
weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
6. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.