Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. Dhandapani, J
Lakshmi Rangarajan – Appellant
Versus
S.Karthikeyan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background regarding the property dispute and initiation of registration proceedings leading to the high court directive. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. non-compliance due to legislative developments does not constitute willful contempt of a court order. (Para 4) |
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner purchased the property bearing Plot No.T-204 measuring 880 Sq. ft., comprised in Survey No.257/1 Part, situated at Vallalar Street, Kodambakkam Village from one Mr.Samsudeen by way of a registered Sale Deed vide Document No.2287 of 1985, dated 22.07.1985 on the file of the Sub Registrar Office, Kodambakkam and has been in possession and enjoyment of the same ever since. While so, when the petitioner’s husband along with an Engineer visited the property for measurement and further construction, they came to know that the petitioner’s vendor had subsequently executed a mortgage deed in favour of the 4th respondent vide Document No.1406 of 2004. Alleging the said document to be forged, the petitioner lodged a complaint before the registration authorities seeking cancellation of the same.
2. Pursuant thereto, the Inspector General of Registration
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
