Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
T.V.Thamilselvi, J
Rathinavelu – Appellant
Versus
Hemalatha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. assessment of factual delays and conduct of parties in rent control litigation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. conditional orders to ensure compliance and expedite execution proceedings. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
ORDER
The Revision Petitioner who is the Landlord seeks a direction for a speedy disposal of the Review Petition No.2 of 2025 filed by the respondent /
tenant.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that much earlier in the year 2017, HRCOP No.39 of 2017 has been initiated by the petitioner / landlord for eviction of the respondent / tenant on the ground of wilful default and bonafide requirements and the same was allowed, against which the respondent/
tenant preferred RCA No.01 of 2024 wherein also before the appellate Court, both the parties were heard and the said appeal was dismissed on 20.03.2025. Immediately thereafter the tenant filed a Review Petition No.02 of 2025 to review the order in RCA No.01 of 2024 and in that application also again the petitioner / landlord filed objections. Pending the Review Petition, the respondent / tenant filed a Memo before the Trial Court to call for the records in HRCOP No.50 of 2017 which was noway connected with present
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
