IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D. Bharatha Chakravarthy, J
Balamurugan – Appellant
Versus
District Registrar – Respondent
W.P(MD)No.13898 of 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. failure to produce parent documents under section 34c of the registration act. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. directing police to issue non-traceable certificates to facilitate registration of documents. (Para 3) |
ORDER
The Writ Petition challenges the impugned refusal check slip dated
08.04.2026.
2. When the petitioner presented a settlement deed for registration, the same is now refused on the ground that the parent document that is relied upon for the purpose of tracing the title is not produced as per section 34C of the Registration Act, 1908. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the said documents are missing, and already a complaint is lodged to the third respondent. Till date, they are not issuing the non-traceable certificate.
3. After considering the submissions made, the third respondent police is directed to make an attempt to trace the document and, if the document is not traceable by following the due process, issue a non-traceable certificate by following the timeline in that regard. Let the complaint dated 02.04.2026 be processed in the manner known to law and ultimately if the documents are not traced, let a non-traceable certificate be issued. Thereafter, the petitioner can represent the document along with the non-traceable certificate and upon such representation the same shall be registered if there is no other impediment. 4. With the above observations and directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.