Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. Dhandapani, J
Marathal – Appellant
Versus
Superintending Engineer (WRD) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of rival contentions and need for technical verification. (Para 4 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. summary of facts involving disruption of irrigation due to highway widening. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 3. court directive for administrative action and inspection to restore irrigation. (Para 5 , 6) |
4. The District Collector Tiruppur District, Collectorate, Tiruppur -641 601 ..Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records on the file of the 3rd respondent relating to the impugned letter in Lr. No.297 E Ko.70/AEE/Pongalur/2025 dated 30.09.2025 and quash the same and consequently to direct the respondents to provide an alternate intake point at Sluice No.11 from the sub canal of the Parambikula Azhiyar Project to supply water to the Petitioner’s lands situated in Survey Nos.97/1A and 116/1B2 of the South Avinasipalayam Village, South Tiruppur Taluk and Tirupur District instead of the already ruined intake point from the said Sub-canal at Sluice No.10 and thereby to restore the irrigational facility to the said petitioners as per the PAP Scheme within a time frame.
For Petitioner : Mr
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
