Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P. Dhanabal, J
A. Vijayalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
Govindasamy – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conflicting claims of property ownership and status. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 2. procedural history and appellate jurisdiction. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. dispute on maintainability of injunction against co-owners. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 4. possession proof grants right to injunction. (Para 15 , 16 , 18) |
| 5. final dismissal of the second appeal. (Para 19) |
JUDGMENT :
P. Dhanabal, J.
The second appeal has been preferred as against the fair and decretal order passed by the third additional Sub Court Coimbatore in AS No 153 of 2012 dated 24/6/2014.
2. The appellant is the first defendant in the main suit. The first respondent has filed the suit as against the first and second respondents herein, for the relief of permanent injunction in respect of suit properties. The trial court decreed the suit and aggrieved by the said decree and judgement, the first defendant has preferred an appeal. The first Appellate Court also confirmed the decree and judgement of the trial court and dismissed the appeal. Aggrieved by the said judgment, the present second appeal has been preferred by the first defendant.
3. The case of plaintiff is that the suit properties are the absolute properties of the plainti
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
