Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mummineni Sudheer Kumar, J
Jagatheesswari – Appellant
Versus
District Collector – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court scrutinizes facts to determine if petition is infructuous. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. petition dismissed as recruitment is completed; liberty to challenge. (Para 4) |
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.04.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR and W.M.P.(MD) No.8470 of 2025 K.Jagatheesswari ... Petitioner Vs.
1.The District Collector, Office of the District Collectorate, Madurai.
2.The Deputy Block Development Officer (Panchayats), Madurai East, Madurai.
3.The Chief Development Planning Officer, Office of the Integrated Child Development Scheme, Madurai East, Madurai. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the candidature of the petitioner pursuant to her applications dated 15.04.2025 and to appoint the petitioner in the post of Anganwadi worker in the light of the order dated 26.11.2013 made in W.A.(MD) No. 484 of
2012 on the file of this Court.
For Petitioner : M/s.H.Jasima Yasmin for M/s.Ajmal Associates For Respondents : Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar Additional Government Pleader
O R D E R
This Writ Petition has be
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
