Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.Dhandapani, J
Metropolitan Transport Corporation – Appellant
Versus
S.Raju – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to labour order regarding worker regularization. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments concerning stale claims and existing settlements. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. rejection of delayed claims after accepting settlement terms. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 4. court allows the petition and sets aside impugned order. (Para 9) |
ORDER
This petition has been filed challenging the order dated 16.05.2023 passed in Case No. C/ 2684/ 2022 by the 2nd respondent herein and to quash the same as being illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction.
2.The case of the petitioner Corporation is that the first respondent was appointed as a daily wage conductor on 01.04.2000 and was subsequently granted regularisation with effect from 01.09.2005 based on the 12(3) Settlement dated 31.08.2005. It is the further case of the petitioner that, in view of the Government ban order dated 05.07.2001, no fresh appointments or regularisations could be made during the currency of the ban period. After a lapse of 17 years, the first respondent filed a claim petition under the Conferment of Permanent Status Act in Case No. C/ 2684/ 2022 before the second respondent seeking regularisation. However, the second respondent, without
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
