SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 42665

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Abdul Quddhose, J
S.Ilavarasu – Appellant
Versus
District Collector Cum Arbitrator – Respondent
Writ Petition



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: P.Saravana Sowmiyan
For the Respondents: D.Ravichander, S.R.Sumathy

A writ petition is not maintainable against an arbitration award passed under the National Highways Act; the proper remedy is to challenge the award under S.34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Headnote:The petitioner challenged an arbitration award passed under the National Highways Act, 1956, by way of a writ petition rather than following the remedy provided under S.34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The petitioner argued that the maintainability of such writ petitions is currently pending consideration before the Supreme Court. The Court determined that, as current binding precedent dictates that awards issued under the National Highways Act must be challenged via the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the writ petition is not maintainable at this stage. The primary issue was whether a writ petition is a maintainable remedy against an arbitration award governed by the National Highways Act. The Court held that settled law requires aggrieved parties to exclusively utilize S.34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, rejecting the argument that the pendency of a similar issue before the Supreme Court confers automatic maintainability to other writ petitions. The writ petition is dismissed as not maintainable, granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh challenge should the law change in the future.

Table of Content
1. petitioner bypassed statutory arbitration challenge timeline. (Para 1 , 2)
2. writ petitions are not maintainable against national highways act awards. (Para 3)
3. liberty granted to file if law changes. (Para 4)

ORDER

The petitioner has challenged the award passed under the National Highways Act through this writ petition.

2. Admittedly, the petitioner did not file an application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 within the limitation period as prescribed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before the appropriate Court. Instead of filing an application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the petitioner has filed this writ petition, that too belatedly.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the issue as to whether the writ petition is maintainable as against an award passed under the National Highways Act is the subject matter of consideration before the Honourable Supreme Court in Writ Petition (Civil) No.1364 of 2023. Therefore, he would submit that this writ petition is maintainable. However, it is settled law as held by various decisions of this Court as well as by the Honourable Supreme Court that a writ petition is not maintainable, challenging the award passed under National Highways Act and if a party is aggrieved by the said award, the said party will have to only challenge the same under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. As on date, the Honourable Supreme Court has not held that a writ petition is maintainable eventhough a writ petition (Civil) may be pending before the Honourable Supreme Court with regard to the very same issue. Therefore, the question of entertaining this writ petition at this stage does not arise. Therefore, this writ petition is not maintainable as on date.

4. Hence, this writ petition is disposed of as not maintainable but by granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition, in case, the parties succeed before the Honourable Supreme Court with regard to their contention that a writ petition is maintainable as against the award passed under the National Highways Act in future. No Costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top