SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 42667

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.Dhandapani, J
Mallika – Appellant
Versus
Thasildar – Respondent
W.P.No. 14757 of 2026|W.M.P.No.16039 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: V.Jai Bharath
For the Respondents: R.Murthi

Revenue authorities must conduct an inquiry and issue a Legal Heirship Certificate if there is no dispute between claimants, even in cases of multiple marriages, unless a legal conflict necessitates civil court intervention.

Headnote:The petitioner challenged an order passed by the revenue authority rejecting her application for a Legal Heirship Certificate solely on the ground that the deceased husband had two wives. The petitioner sought recognition for herself, her daughter, and the children of the second wife as legal heirs, noting there was no dispute between the families. The court examined the relevant government order and held that the existence of multiple wives does not automatically preclude issuance of a certificate if there is no conflict between the parties involved. Issues framed by the court included whether the revenue authority may reject an application for a Legal Heirship Certificate due to a multiple-marriage scenario even in the absence of a dispute between the legal heirs. The Ratio Decidendi rests on the principle that the revenue authority is mandated to conduct an enquiry and issue the certificate where there is no warring claim amongst the legal heirs, specifically noting that children of such marriages are often deemed Class-I legal heirs. The court allowed the writ petition, set aside the impugned order, and remanded the matter to the first respondent for fresh consideration in light of the guidelines and the Court's observation.

Table of Content
1. factual background regarding the denial of a legal heirship certificate. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. revenue authorities must issue certificates absent genuine disputes among heirs. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. mandate to remand for reconsideration based on established legal guidelines. (Para 11)

O R D E R

This Writ Petition is filed challenging the order of the first respondent dated

10.02.2022, in and by which, the claim of the petitioner claiming Legal Heirship Certificate, came to be rejected.

2. The case of the petitioner is that she is the first wife of late V.Kumar, who died intestate on 01.09.2021. Her husband has also married the petitioner's sister Sharadha. The deceased left behind the petitioner (first wife), one Manimegalai (daughter born through the petitioner), K.Manikandan (son born through the 2nd wife) and K.Yasodha (daughter born through the 2nd wife). According to the petitioner, after the demise of her husband, all the above persons became entitled to succeed to his estate as Class-I legal heirs and therefore, on 10.02.2022, the petitioner submitted an online application before the 1st respondent Tahsildar seeking issuance of Legal Heirship Certificate. However, to her shock and surprise, the 1st respondent rejected the petitioner's application vide impugned order dated 10.02.2022, solely on the ground that the deceased had two wives, based on the reports submitted by the respondents 2 and 3. Challenging the same, the petitioner is before this Court.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, being elder sister of Sharadha, has no objection for inclusion of her sister and her children as legal heirs of her husband late Mr.V.Kumar and further submitted that when there is no dispute or counter claim, the first respondent ought to conduct an enquiry and issue the Certificate and accordingly, he seeks for appropriate direction.

4. Per contra, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents submits that G.O.Ms.No.110 dated 13.03.2024 does not permit issuance of Class I legal heir certificate if the deceased has two wives and the course open to the petitioner is only to approach the Civil Court and seek for Class I legal heir certificate and rightly, the Tahsildar has rejected the application for issuance of legal heir certificate, which does not require any interference.

5. This Court considered the submissions advanced by the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record.

6. Before proceeding to analyze the legality and sustainability of the present petition, the whole case is predicated upon G.O.Ms.No.110 dated 13.03.2024, which pertains to the persons, who would fall within the ambit of class I legal heirs of a deceased person and for better appreciation, clause (b) of the said Government order, which is relevant is quoted hereunder :- “In case of death of re-married person, after the demise of legally wedded wife or after the divorce granted by competent Court or permissible under the Personal Law, concerned.

i. Children of the pre-deceased/legally divorced wife.

ii. Existing Spouse(s) of the deceased, (mention the names of the spouses, if more than one spouse, if permissible under relevant Personal Law)

iii. Children/Legally adopted Children of the deceased iv. Parents of the deceased”

7. From the above, it is evident that children of pre-deceased wife or legally divorced wife, existing spouses, if more than one spouse, permissible under relevant personal law, children/legally adopted children and parents of the deceased would fall within the ambit of class I legal heirs.

8. In the present case, it is even the case of the petitioner that the deceased, who is her husband, had married her younger sister, viz., one Sharadha, from whom the deceased had begotten two children viz., one Ms.Yasodha and Mr.Manikandan. The legal status of the children or the second wife is not disputed by the petitioner and the petitioner even conc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top