Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R.Sakthivel, J
Aravinth – Appellant
Versus
Superintendent of Police – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of events leading to the bail application. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. conditions for grant of bail and judicial discretion. (Para 6 , 7) |
...3rd Respondent/ Defacto Complainant PRAYER :Criminal Appeal filed under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 as amended by Act 1 of 2016, praying to allow the above Criminal Appeal by setting aside the order dated April 20, 2026 in Cr.M.P.No.252 of 2026 on the file of the District and Sessions Court, Nagapattinam and enlarge the Petitioner on bail pending investigation in Cr.No.44 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police.
For Appellant(s) : Mr.K.Govi Ganesan For Respondent(s): Mr.V.Meganathan, Government Advocate (Criminal Side)
for R1 and R2 JUDGMENT This Criminal Appeal has been filed as against the order dated April 20, 2026 in Cr.M.P.No.252 of 2026 on the file of the District and Sessions Court, Nagapattinam and enlarge the Petitioner on bail pending investigation in Cr.No.44 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police.
2.Heard the counsel for the Appellant and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for the Respondents 1 and 2 and perused the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
