IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R.Sakthivel, J
Madhan – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural status of the criminal appeal and representation of parties. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. summary of alleged offences under bns and sc/st act and trial court history. (Para 5) |
| 3. granting bail based on custodial duration with specific restrictive conditions. (Para 6 , 7) |
...Respondent No.3/Defacto Complainant PRAYER: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 praying to set aside the order dated April 30, 2026 passed by the learned Judge, Court of Sessions Division, Tirupattur District in Crl.MP.No.818 of 2026 and enlarge the Appellants on bail in Crime No.41/2026 pending on the file of the 2nd Respondent police.
For Appellant(s) : Mr.E.Kannadasan For Respondent(s): Mr.V.Meganathan, Government Advocate (Criminal Side)
for R1 and R2 Service Awaited for R3
JUDGMENT
This Criminal Appeal has been filed praying to set aside the order dated April 30, 2026 passed by the learned Judge, Court of Sessions Division, Tirupattur District in Crl.MP.No.818 of 2026 and enlarge the Appellants on bail in Crime No.41 of 2026 pending on the file of the 2nd Respondent police.
2.Heard the counsel for the App
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.