IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D. Bharatha Chakravarthy, R. Poornima, JJ
Saravanan – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
H.C.P.(MD) No.665 of 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of facts involving a missing person and prior police investigation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. habeas corpus is not maintainable for cases involving voluntary departure of a spouse. (Para 4) |
[Order of the Court was made by D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.]
The petitioner has filed this habeas corpus petition seeking a direction to the respondent Police to secure his wife, namely, Manimegalai, aged about 32 years, produce her before this Court and set her at liberty.
2. It is the case of the petitioner that he is toiling with two tender children and the respondent Police is not taking steps to trace out his wife.
3. In reply thereof, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent Police would submit that upon receipt of a complaint from the petitioner, a “Woman Missing” case was registered. Earlier, the petitioner filed H.C.P.(MD) No.481 of 2026 and the same was dismissed as withdrawn as the detenue came back to the petitioner on 10.04.2026 and again she has gone away with the same person.
4. In view thereof, it can be seen that the wife of the petitioner is not under any illegal custody. Rather, on her own volition, the detenue is having extramarital affair and has gone away with the second respondent.
Therefore, this is not a fit case where the habeas corpus petition can be entertained.
5. Accordingly, granting liberty to the petitioner with reference to his matrimonial reliefs, this habeas corpus petition stands closed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.