SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 43286

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.R. Swaminathan, J
Asian College of Engineering and Technology – Appellant
Versus
Anna University – Respondent
Writ Petition (Not specified)



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Kandhan Duraisami
For the Respondents: U. Bharanidharan, V. Sudha

A university is legally obligated under the UGC Regulations, 2023, to notify the autonomous status of a college within the stipulated period once such status has been granted by the University Grants Commission.

Headnote:The petitioner challenged the failure of the respondent University to notify its autonomous status granted by the University Grants Commission (UGC) pursuant to Regulation 4.2 of the University Grants Commission (Conferment of Autonomous Status upon colleges and measures for maintenance of standards in autonomous colleges) Regulation, 2023. The Court examined the statutory requirement for the University to issue such notification within a prescribed timeframe and noted that the issue was already covered by previous judicial precedents. The core issue was whether the University was mandated to notify the autonomous status of the college despite its own delays. The Court relied on established principles that universities must comply with UGC regulations regarding the conferment of autonomous status and found that the petitioner was entitled to the relief sought based on previous settled orders regarding the same regulatory obligations. The writ petition was allowed with a direction to the respondent University to notify the autonomous status of the petitioner college within four weeks.

Table of Content
1. failure to notify autonomous status as mandated by ugc regulations constitutes a breach requiring judicial intervention. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20.05.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.R. SWAMINATHAN Asian College of Engineering and Technology, rep. by its Chairman, Kondayampalayam, near Saravanampatti, Coimbatore 641 110. ..Petitioner Vs.

1. Anna University, rep. by its Registrar, Chennai 600 025.

2. University Grants Commission, rep. by its Secretary, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi 110 002. ..Respondents Prayer: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent herein to scrupulously adhere to Regulation 4.2 of University Grants Commission (Conferment of Autonomous Status upon colleges and measures for maintenance of standards in autonomous colleges) Regulation, 2023 and forthwith notify the autonomous status granted to the petitioner college in the order of the University Grants Commission in No.F.2-10/2023 (AC- Policy) dated 17.04.2026 in line with the judgment in W.A. Nos. 2514, 1778 and 1840 of 2025 dated 02.09.2025 and the order of the Supreme Court in S.L.P(C) Nos. 29146, 29057 and 29233 of 2025 dated 15.10.2025.

For Petitioner :: Mr. Kandhan Duraisami For Respondents :: Mr.U. Bharanidharan for R1 Ms.V. Sudha, Sr. Central Govt. Standing Counsel for R2 O R D E R Heard both sides.

2. The writ petitioner College was granted autonomous status by the University Grants Commission (‘UGC’ in short) on

17.04.2026. As per Regulation 4.2 of UGC Regulations, 2023, the 1st respondent University has to notify the autonomous status granted to the petitioner college within a period of four weeks thereafter. Since the 1st respondent University has not done so, the present writ petition has been filed.

3. The issue raised in this writ petition is no longer res integra. The learned counsel for the petitioner has enclosed a catena of earlier orders on the very same subject. One such order is dated 05.02.2025 made in W.P. Nos. 35, 38 and 39 of 2025 and paragraph No.9 of the said order reads as follows:

‘9. In view of the above discussion and under the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the Writ Petitions deserve to be allowed. Hence, the Writ Petitions are allowed with a direction to the first respondent University to notify the autonomous status granted to the petitioner Colleges’ as per Regulation 4.2 of the UGC Regulations, 2023, within a period of four weeks, from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.’

G.R. SWAMINATHAN,J.

nv

4. In view of the above, I direct the 1st respondent University to notify the autonomous status granted to the writ petitioner College as per Regulation 4.2 of the UGC Regulations, 2023 within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. The writ petition stands allowed. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top