Back
2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 43294
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.R. Swaminathan, J
Neo Church Tharsis – Appellant
Versus
Government of India – Respondent
W.P. No. 19984 of 2026|W.M.P. Nos. 21342 & 21345 of 2026
For the Appellants/Petitioners: C. Prabakaran
For the Respondents: M. Sathyan, B. Vijay, M. Murali
Land acquisition proceedings under the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997 require the consideration of objections following the issuance of the formal notification under Section 3(2) of the Act.
Headnote:The petitioner challenged an acquisition process for a Metro Rail project, expressing concern that their land objections were not being considered. The Court noted the respondents' submission that the statutory acquisition process under the relevant state legislation had not yet commenced. Issues raised involved whether the current land acquisition proceedings satisfied procedural requirements for hearing objections. The Court determined that since the notification under the relevant Act had not been issued, the apprehension was premature, and the respondents were obligated to consider objections once the formal statutory process commenced. The writ petition was disposed of by recording the respondents' submission that the petitioner's objections would be duly considered upon the issuance of the statutory notification under the Act.
Act Referred
Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997: S.3(2)
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. mandatory consideration of land owner objections during statutory acquisition process. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
For Petitioner :: Mr.C. Prabakaran For Respondents :: Mr.M. Sathyan for R1 Mr.B. Vijay for R2 Mr.M. Murali, Govt. Advocate for R3 to R5 O R D E R The petitioner apprehends that his land may be acquired for Metro Rail Project without taking note of his objections.
2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel for the 2nd respondent submitted that notification under Section 3(2) of Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997 is yet to be issued and as and when the same is issued, the petitioner’s objections will be duly taken note of.
3. Recording the aforesaid submission, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
