Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G. R. Swaminathan, V. Lakshminarayanan, JJ
K.T. Velavan – Appellant
Versus
District Collector – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. granting interim protection pending the exhaustion of the statutory revision remedy. (Para 2 , 4 , 5) |
Heard both sides.
2. The petitioner suffered an eviction order under Section 6 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachments Act, 1905 . Aggrieved by the same, he filed an appeal before the District Collector, Namakkal, under Section 10 of the Act. The appeal was dismissed on 08.05.2026. The petitioner can very well avail the revisional remedy before the Government.
4. The learned counsel for petitioner states that the revision petition will be filed within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Hence, it is directed that the impugned order shall be kept in abeyance till the disposal of the revision petition. However, this benefit will not accrue to the petitioner if the revision petition is not filed within two weeks as undertaken before this Court. The original impugned order shall be returned to the learned counsel for the petitioner.
5. This Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
