2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 43306

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G. R. Swaminathan, V. Lakshminarayanan, JJ
Madesh S – Appellant
Versus
District Collector Thiruvarur – Respondent
WP.No.20012 of 2026

The High Court can issue a writ of mandamus directing administrative authorities to consider public representations and grievances regarding the proposed location of liquor outlets before their establishment, ensuring public welfare is safeguarded.

Headnote:The petitioner challenged the proposed establishment of a liquor retail shop in a densely populated residential area, citing proximity to a temple and educational institutions. Relying on Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to prevent the opening of the shop and requested consideration of a prior representation. The Court found it appropriate to direct the licensing authority to address the petitioner's grievances on merits. The main issue was whether the administrative authorities should consider public objections regarding the location of the liquor outlet. The Court reasoned that an official authority must evaluate the impact of the proposed establishment on public welfare and residential safety before moving forward. The Court held that the balancing of administrative convenience with community concerns is a mandatory procedural requirement. The Court directed the first respondent to dispose of the representation within eight weeks and ordered that the shop shall not be opened until such decision is reached.