Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.Bharatha Chakravarthy, R.Poornima, JJ
Senthilkumar – Appellant
Versus
District Collector – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of factual background regarding land eviction and conflicting ownership claims. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. court establishes that revenue records prevail and civil suits preclude parallel writ jurisdiction. (Para 6) |
| 3. final dismissal order with liberty to seek relief in pending civil proceedings. (Para 7) |
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 20.05.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY and THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.POORNIMA W.P(MD)No.14233 of 2026 and WMP(MD)No.10655 of 2026 N.Senthilkumar ... Petitioner Vs.
1. The District Collector, Dindigul District.
2. The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments, Dindigul, Dindigul District.
3. The Assistant Engineer, Highways Department, Dindigul District. ...Respondents PRAYER :- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 3rd respondent vide Na.Ka.No.Aakiramippu/31678/2026/Ne/Oo/dated 11.05.2026 and quash the same as illegal and arbitrary and consequently to direct the 3rd respondent not to evict th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
