Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mummineni Sudheer Kumar, J
Rabin – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Tamil Nadu Co-operative Milk Producers Federation Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural compliance for writ petitions at the admission stage. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. consensual disposal of writ petitions through directed administrative representation review. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. court directive for timely administrative consideration of representations. (Para 8) |
O R D E R
Ms.K.Porkodi, learned counsel for the Government, takes notice for the first respondent and Mr.M.Thirunavukkarasu, learned counsel, takes notice for the third respondent.
2. In view of the orders proposed to be passed, notice to the respondents 2 & 4 is dispensed with.
3. With the consent of both sides, this writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the Government appearing for the first respondent and the learned counsel appearing for the third respondent.
5. Though this writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned transfer order, learned counsel for the petitioner restricted the relief only to the extent of directing the respondents to consider the representation dated 30.03.2026 submitted by the petitioner.
6. While the petitioner was working as Technician (Boiler) at the third resp
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
