Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.R. Swaminathan, V. Lakshminarayanan, JJ
R. Muniyammal – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. timely disposal of pending statutory revisions ensures due process and prevents premature coercive action. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Kingston Jerold For Respondents : Mr.Mohd. Fayaz Ali Govt. Counsel for R-1 : Mr.D.B.R.Prabhu Stdg. Counssel for RR 2 to 4 * * * * * ORDER (Order of the Court was made by G.R.Swaminathan, J.)
Heard both sides.
2. The petitioner is alleged to have put up an unauthorised construction on his property at No.5/4, Muthukumarappa Street, Chidharajan Colony, Peravallur, Chennai.
3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that a revision petition filed under Section 80-A of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971, is pending before the first respondent and the enquiry is also over and therefore, the first respondent may be directed to dispose of the revision petition within a stipulated time.
4. In view of the said submission, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the first respondent to dispose of the pending revision petition filed by the petitioner under Section 80-A of the said Act, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till then, no coercive ac
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
