SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 43630

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.R.Swaminathan, V.Lakshminarayanan, JJ
Slar Machines And Methods – Appellant
Versus
State Bank Of India – Respondent
WP No.20801 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ali Hassan Khan

The High Court may direct the Debts Recovery Tribunal to expedite the disposal of a pending securitization application when parties seek an early resolution of enforcement actions under the SARFAESI Act, without prejudice to the merits of the case.

Headnote:The petitioner challenged an order passed under S.14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. The petitioner requested a direction to the Debts Recovery Tribunal-III, Chennai, to expedite the disposal of an existing pending application against measures taken under S.13(4) of the Act. The Court, upon considering the limited prayer made by the petitioner, directed the Tribunal to dispose of the matter within a specified timeline. The main issue was whether the pending securitization application before the tribunal could be expedited. The Court reasoned that judicial intervention should be limited to ensuring procedural efficiency and timely disposal of pending matters without delving into the merits of the bank's enforcement actions. The writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Tribunal to decide the pending application on or before 31.08.2026.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks expedition of pending securitization application before drt. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court grants timeline for tribunal disposal of pending application. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)

For Petitioner : Mr.Ali Hassan Khan ORDER (Order of the Court was made by G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.)

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. Even though the writ petitioner has challenged the order passed under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, (for short, ‘the Act’), learned counsel submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if this Court directs the Debts Recovery Tribunal-III, Chennai, to dispose of S.A.No.209 of 2022, filed by the petitioner against the action taken under Section 13(4) of the Act.

3. In view of the said submission, we dispose of this writ petition by directing Debts Recovery Tribunal No.III to dispose of S.A.No.209 of 2022, on merits and in accordance with law on or before 31.08.2026.

4. It is open to the petitioner to file an advance hearing petition before the Debts Recovery Tribunal. If the petitioner has filed any amendment petition, the same may be numbered and disposed of in accordance with law.

5. We make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. There will be no order as to costs. WMP Nos.22434 and 22436 of 2026 stand closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top