Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mohammed Shaffiq, J
Velmurugan – Appellant
Versus
District Collector – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's authority to dispose of a writ petition at the admission stage based on counsel consent. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. basis of the petitioner's claim concerning temple rights and historical obstruction by third parties. (Para 3) |
| 3. requirement to exhaust statutory remedies for temple management disputes. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
ORDER
By consent of learned counsel on both sides, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.
2. This Writ Petition has been filed for issuance of writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider petitioner's representation dated 20.05.2026 and to issue appropriate directions to the 5th respondent to provide police protection, ensure his participation in the temple festival, facilitate the collection of pangali vari from him and take necessary action against respondents 7 and 8 for their unlawful conduct.
3. The brief facts of the case is that the petitioner belongs to the Marudhakula Nadar community and claims hereditary rights as a pangali in the Arulmigu Sri Annamar Swamy, Sri Kannimar Swamy and Sri Karupparayan Swamy Temple situated at Goundampalayam. The petitioner contends that his father, Late Arumugam, w
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
