SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 43681

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
A.D. Jagadish Chandira, P. Vadamalai, JJ
Baskaran – Appellant
Versus
Superintendent of Police – Respondent
H.C.P.(MD)No.693 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: R. Manoharan
For the Respondents: T. Lenin Kumar

A Writ of Habeas Corpus is not maintainable in cases involving a missing person where there is no allegation or evidence of unlawful or illegal detention.

Headnote:The petitioner filed a writ of Habeas Corpus seeking the production of his missing daughter before the court. The court examined the essential requirements for the issuance of such a writ. The court addressed whether a Habeas Corpus petition is maintainable for a missing person where no unlawful detention is alleged. Applying the principle that unlawful detention is a sine qua non for such relief, the court determined that the petition was not maintainable. The petition was disposed of with a direction to the respondents to effectively pursue the investigation to trace the missing person.

Table of Content
1. nature of the petition and appearance of parties. (Para 1 , 2)
2. requirement of unlawful detention for maintainability of habeas corpus petitions. (Para 3 , 4)

(Order of the Court was made by A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents therein to produce the body/person of the petitioner's daughter, namely Rajapriya, D/o. Baskaran, aged about 32 years, before this Hon'ble Court and set her at liberty.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Counsel appearing for the State.

3. From the facts this Court finds that this Habeas Corpus Petition is in respect of person who is simply missing and not under unlawful detention. Unlawful detention is sine qua non for issuance of Writ of Habeas Corpus.

4. The Division Bench of this Court in H.C.P.(MD) Nos.793 and 658 of 2025 has relied on the following orders:

a) Simmi Bai .vs. Shrimaan Police Mahanirishak Mahodaya and others (2025 SCC OnLine MP 893)

b) H.C.P.No.2191 of 2017 (Kalaiarasi vs. State) dated 7.5.2018 c) K.Sukumari vs. The Superintendent of Police (Crl.O.P.(MD) No.

19255 of 2016 dated 18.9.2018)

and has held that Habeas Corpus Petition in respect of missing person whose detention is not stated to be unlawful/illegal is not maintainable.

4. In view of the above, this Habeas Corpus Petition stands disposed of with a direction to respondents 1 and 2 to effectively pursue the investigation for tracing the missing person in the present case. Accordingly, the investigating officer shall continue the investigation and take all necessary steps to trace the missing persons.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top