SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 43684

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G. R. Swaminathan, V. Lakshminarayanan, JJ
N. Prakasam – Appellant
Versus
Addl. Chief Secretary to Govt. Revenue and Disaster Management Department – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: R. Ganesan
For the Respondents: Mohammed Fayaz Ali

Table of Content
1. determination that a docket order is not appealable under letters patent. (Para 1 , 2)

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by G.R.Swaminathan J.)

Heard both sides.

2. The order passed by the learned Single Judge does not constitute a judgment within the meaning of Clause 15 of the Letters Patent. Hence, this Writ Appeal is dismissed as not maintainable. However, it is open to the appellant to implead such persons as he deems fit. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top