SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 43861

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Murali Shankar, J
Minor C.Arul Vijay – Appellant
Versus
Nill – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: R. Devaraj

Table of Content
1. factual background regarding the petition for leave to sell property. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. criteria for alienating minor's property: paramount consideration of welfare and necessity. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
3. granting permission subject to strict financial safeguards for the minor. (Para 12)

JUDGMENT

This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is directed against the order passed in G.W.O.P.No.13 of 2022, dated 12.09.2024, on the file of the Principal District Court, Karur, dismissing the petition filed under Section 8 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act.

2. The appellants are the petitioners and they being the parents of the minor C.Arul Vijay filed the petition under Section 8 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act seeking permission to the petitioners to sell half share of the petition mentioned property belonging to their minor son.

3. For the sake of convenience and brevity, the parties will hereinafter be referred as per their status/ranking in their original suit.

4. The petitioners' case in brief is as follows:

The petitioners' minor son was born on 28.06.2011. The second petitioner – father for himself and on behalf of his minor son had purchased the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top