Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P. Dhanabal, J
Kani – Appellant
Versus
Soniya – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner asserts that interference by local advocates warrants transferring his case to another jurisdiction. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. the court requires material evidence to support transfer requests; unsubstantiated allegations carry no legal weight. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 30/04/2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL and Crl.MP(MD)No.18154 & 18155 of 2023 S.Kani ... Petitioner/Petitioner Vs
1. Soniya
2. Minor Mahisree ... Respondent/Respondent (Minor 2nd Respondent represented by his Mother and natural guardian, the 1st Respondent)
PRAYER :-
To withdraw and transfer the case in M.C.No.21/2023 on the file of the Family Court, Theni to the file of any other competent court having jurisdiction to try the same in any district and consequently direct the transferee court to dispose the same in a manner known to law.
For Petitioner : M/s.Jerin Mathew.M, Advocate.
For Respondent : Mr.A.Dharani for R1
ORDER
This petition has been filed to withdraw and transfer the case in M.C.No.21 of 2023 on the file of the Family Court, Theni, to the file of any other competent Court having jurisdiction to try the same in any dis
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
