Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D. Bharatha Chakravarthy, J
P. Santhosh – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner, Dindigul Corporation – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural compliance and the requirement of providing notice in property tax assessments. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. remand of assessment process to ensure adherence to principles of natural justice. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated: 30.04.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY and W.M.P(MD)No.10331 of 2026 P.Santhosh ... Petitioner Vs.
The Commissioner, Dindigul Corporation, Dindigul. ...Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the respondent herein in his impugned notice dated 07.03.2026 in respect of the petitioners assessment No. 078/006/ 900222 and quash the same and to pass such further or other orders as this Honble Court may deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Hemakarthikeyan For Respondent : Mr.J.Lawrence Standing Counsel ORDER The writ petition is filed challenging the impugned notice dated
07.03.2026. The same is a demand notice in respect of the petitioner's property bearing Assessment No.078/006/900222.
2. Heard M/s.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
