Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. Sathish Kumar, M. Jothiraman, JJ
Indra Gandhi – Appellant
Versus
Additional Registrar General – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenges recovery of excess salary payments following administrative pay re-fixation. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. recovery from class iii and iv employees is impermissible. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. impugned recovery orders quashed and directive for refund issued. (Para 6) |
(Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.
Challenging the impugned order passed by the first respondent dated 31.10.2025 and the consequential order passed by the second respondent dated 24.03.2026, and seeking a direction to cancel the said orders of refixation and recovery, and consequently to direct the respondents to pay the arrears of salary, pension, gratuity, and all retirement benefits with interest for the belated payment of retirement benefits, the petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition.
2.The petitioner, appointed as a Typist through the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission in 2009, was subsequently promoted to higher posts up to Sherishtadar based on an unblemished service record. Her pay was fixed and revised by the authorities in accordance with applicable Government Orders, and increments were granted without any misrepresentation on her part. After nearly 15 years of se
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
