SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 44303

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. SATHISH KUMAR, M. JOTHIRAMAN, JJ
Periyaki Karuppan – Appellant
Versus
Secretary, Bar Council of Tamilnadu & Puducherry – Respondent
W.P.(MD)No.3228 of 2026|W.M.P.(MD)No.2653 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: S.Sivaprakash
For the Respondents: K.R.Laxman

The High Court may direct a statutory body like the Bar Council to expeditiously process representations regarding professional qualification disputes once internal procedural prerequisites, such as committee formation, are satisfied, ensuring adherence to natural justice.

Headnote:The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Bar Council to consider a complaint regarding the alleged submission of a fake law degree by the fourth respondent seeking enrolment as an advocate. The petitioner alleged the fourth respondent had not regularly attended college. The Court noted the Bar Council's submission that the complaint would be examined by a Committee following the conclusion of the pending election process. The Court directed the Bar Council to constitute such a Committee and consider the petitioner's representation on merits after providing a fair hearing to both parties involved. Issues centered on whether the Court should intervene in administrative disciplinary processes of the Bar Council prior to a formal decision. The Court's ratio decidendi rests on the principle of institutional adherence to due process and statutory procedures, finding that the Bar Council is the appropriate statutory body to evaluate enrollment eligibility and examine evidence of professional misconduct or qualification fraud. Resultantly, the writ petition was disposed of with a mandate for the Bar Council to process the complaint once the committee is constituted.

Table of Content
1. court intervention in professional enrolment verification. (Para 1 , 2)
2. mandate for statutory bodies to follow due process in disciplinary inquiries. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)

(Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.)

This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner and to take appropriate action in accordance with law as against the fourth respondent.

2.According to the petitioner, the fourth respondent had submitted an application before the Bar Council seeking enrolment as an Advocate by claiming that she had undergone and completed her law course by attending the College regularly. However, it is the specific allegation of the petitioner that the fourth respondent had never attended the college and had made false claims for the purpose of enrolment. In this regard, the petitioner had already submitted a complaint before the Bar Council seeking appropriate action.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the first respondent submitted that the complaint given by the petitioner has to be examined by the appropriate Committee constituted by the Bar Council. It is further submitted that, due to the ongoing election process, the Committee has not yet been constituted and immediately after constitution of the Committee, the petitioner’s complaint would be considered on merits and appropriate orders would be passed after affording opportunity to both the petitioner as well as the fourth respondent.

4.Recording the above submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the first respondent, this Court directs the first respondent to constitute the appropriate Committee after completion of the election process and thereafter consider the petitioner’s representation/complain on merits and in accordance with law after issuing notice and affording sufficient opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as the fourth respondent.

5.With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top