Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.K. Ilanthiraiyan, J
P.Thangavel – Appellant
Versus
Periyasamy – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the petition, the nature of the property, and the events leading to the disputed revenue record mutation and pending civil litigation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments presented by the petitioner regarding title dispute and respondent's contention regarding the legitimacy of the mutation. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's analysis of the facts regarding the prayer in the civil suit and the suppression of the previous rejection of the patta request. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. court's determination that revenue authorities lack jurisdiction to adjudicate title questions while civil suits are pending. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 5. final outcome: impugned orders quashed, and liberty given to parties to await civil court outcome. (Para 13) |
ORDER
This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the orders dated 05.03.2020, 12.09.2018 & 20.09.2018 passed by the respondents 2 to 4.
2. The petitioner owned agricultural property comprised in Survey Nos.94/12B, 94/13C, 94/13D, 94/14A & 95/5, situated at Pullagoundampatty Village, Sankari Taluk, Salem District. Originally, the properties were owned by his father and his brother one K.Raju and they were jointly cultivating the said lands. The sa
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
