SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 44370

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.T. Asha, J
Anbazhagan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
WMP No. 17954 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: P.Murali
For the Respondents: S.Mythreye Chandru

An employee is entitled to the selection grade upon completing ten years of service in the post of Headmaster, following consistent established judicial precedents on service grade benefits.

Headnote:The present petition is filed under Art.226 of the Constitution seeking to quash an administrative order denying the petitioner selection grade benefits. The petitioner sought the sanction of selection grade in their capacity as Headmaster, citing ten years of continuous service. The Court examined the matter in light of established precedents regarding service benefits for educational staff. The core issue was whether the petitioner is entitled to the selection grade for the period between 2008 and 2018. Following the ratio decidendi established in previous coordinate bench rulings, the Court determined that the petitioner’s completion of ten years of service mandates the grant of selection grade. The reasoning centered on the applicability of consistent judicial precedents to identical factual scenarios. The writ petition is allowed, and the respondents are directed to sanction the selection grade and consequential benefits within eight weeks.

Table of Content
1. nature of the relief sought in the writ petition. (Para 1)
2. application of binding judicial precedents regarding selection grade entitlement based on ten years of service. (Para 2 , 3)

ORDER

This writ petition is filed for the following relief:

“To call for the records relating to the impugned order issued by the 3rd respondent in O.Mu.No.7176/A1/2021 dated 03.11.2021 and to QUASH the same and consequently directing the respondents to sanction selection grade to the petitioner in the post of Headmaster in consideration of 10 years completed service in the post of Headmaster from 01.06.2008 to 31.05.2018, with consequential retirement benefits and pensionary benefits.”

2. This Court had an occasion to consider a similar case in WP.No.17675 of 2023. After hearing the arguments and relying upon the earlier judgement of this Court in N.S.Rangasamy Vs. The Director of High School Education, Chennai – WP.No.22589, the learned Judge has held as follows:

“In view of the above, the impugned order is set aside and the respondents are directed to sanction selection grade to the petitioner in the post of Headmaster in the 5th respondent school in consideration of 10 years of service rendered in the post of Headmaster from 01.06.2012 to 31.05.2022, with consequential retirement and pensionary benefits, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

3. The aforesaid decision is squarely applicable to the facts of the present case. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. The respondents are directed to sanction selection grade to the petitioner in the post of Headmaster in consideration of 10 years completed service in the post of Headmaster from 01.06.2008 to 31.05.2018, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top