SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 44873

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.T. Asha, J
S.Suresh – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF TAMILNADU REP. BY ITS DEPUTY SECRETAR – Respondent
WP No. 13475 of 2026|WMP No. 14720 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: P. Murali
For the Respondents: R. Neelakandan, M. Bindran, P.S. Raman, Mythree Chandru, V. Vijay Shankar

Recovery of excess payments made in selection grade scale from retired or serving employees is prohibited, and pension must be computed based on the pay scale drawn at the time of retirement, subject to specific rule amendments.

Headnote:(A) Service Law - Pay Fixation - Recovery of excess payment - Recovery of amounts already paid from retired employees or those in service regarding selection grade/special grade scale of pay is impermissible. (Para 3)

(B) Pensionary Benefits - Computation - Pension should be computed based on the scale of pay drawn on the date of retirement. (Para 3)

Issues: Whether the petitioner is entitled to the continuation of pension and terminal benefits based on the last pay drawn and whether recovery of excess payments is permissible.

Table of Content
1. prayer for quashing recovery order and ensuring pension benefits based on last pay drawn. (Para 1 , 2)
2. application of directions from w.p.no.12275 of 2024 regarding pay refixation and prohibition of recovery from retirees. (Para 3)
3. granting relief in terms of the cited precedent for similarly situated petitioners. (Para 4)

Prayer:

This petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the Impugned order of 1st respondent by his proceedings in Letter No.11100/Tho.Ka.1(1)/2023-1 dated 15.12.2023 to quash the same and consequently directing the respondents to continue to sanction pension and other terminal benefits, based on the last pay drawn by the petitioner.

ORDER

This writ petition is filed for the following relief:

“To call for the records relating to the Impugned order of 1st respondent by his proceedings in Letter No.11100/Tho.Ka.1(1)/2023-1 dated 15.12.2023 to quash the same and consequently directing the respondents to continue to sanction pension and other terminal benefits, based on the last pay drawn by the petitioner.”

2. Heard the learned counsels on both sides and perused the materials available on record.

3. The issue involved in the present writ petition was earlier considered in a batch of writ petitions in W.P.No.12275 of 2024 dated 02.03.2026, wherein a similar relief was claimed. The learned Judge after hearing the arguments of both sides and discussing the relevant Rules and Government Orders in detail, had ultimately disposed of the writ petitions with directions. These directions are extracted herein below:

85. In the result, all the writ petitions are disposed of with the following directions:~

i) The impugned order directing the fixation of the selection grade/special grade scale of pay at the first promotional level and 2nd promotional level is set aside to the extent that there shall be no recovery of amount, which has already been paid, from the petitioners ;

ii) Insofar as the petitioners, who have retired from service is concerned, no amount shall be recovered on the basis of the impugned order from the retiral benefits/pensionary benefits of the petitioners with regard to the amount already paid;

iii) Insofar as the petitioners, who are still in service, no amount shall be recovered on the basis of the impugned order from the salary of the petitioners with regard to the amount already paid;

iv) In case any amount has already been recovered from any of the petitioners towards excess payment made in the selection grade scale, the same shall not be refunded to the petitioners and the respondents shall refix the selection grade scale of pay of the said petitioners after amendment to FR 22~B and, thereafter, upon computation, if any amount is due and payable to any of petitioners, the same shall be paid by the respondents forthwith;

v) Until FR 22~B is amended so as to include the directions given in G.O. Ms. No.63305/Pay Cell/2010~1 dated 8.11.2010, more particularly para 4 (i) of the said Government Order, no action shall be taken by the respondents to refix the scale of pay of the petitioners and similarly placed persons;

vi) Subject to amendment, if any, that may be made to FR 22~B, with reference to G.O. Ms. No.63305/Pay Cell/2020~1 dated 8.11.2020, the respondents are at liberty to revise the salary of the persons who are in service by refixing their scales of pay in the selection grade as also the pensionary benefits of the pensioners by refixing their scales of pay in selection grade in line with the amendments that may be made to FR 22~B for computing the admissible pension payable based on para 4 (i) of G.O. Ms. No.63305/Pay Cell/2010~1 dated 8.11.2010, which shall be applicable only prospectively and not retrospectively;

vii) Pursuant to the amendment, if any, made to FR 22~B, upon refixation of the scales of pay of the petitioners, and computing the revised pay that the petition

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top