2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 44876
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.T. Asha, J
D. Mani – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU – Respondent
WP No. 13631 of 2026 | WMP No. 14914 of 2026
For the Appellants/Petitioners: P. Murali
For the Respondents: R. Neelakandan, M. Bindran, P.S. Raman, Mythree Chandru, V. Vijay Shankar
Recovery of excess payments made in the selection grade scale from retired or serving employees is prohibited, and any refixation of pay or pension is subject to the amendment of FR 22-B.
Headnote:(A) Service Law - Recovery of Excess Payment - Selection Grade Scale - Recovery of amounts already paid to employees, whether retired or still in service, regarding the fixation of selection grade or special grade scale of pay is impermissible. (Para 3)
(B) Pay Fixation - Fundamental Rules - Refixation of pay and pensionary benefits is contingent upon the amendment of FR 22-B to incorporate specific Government Order directions, and any such revision shall be applicable prospectively and not retrospectively. (Para 3)
Issues: Whether the recovery of excess payment from the petitioner's retiral benefits is legal and whether the pay should be refixed based on the last pay drawn.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. prayer for quashing recovery orders and refund of dcrg with interest. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. prohibition of recovery of excess pay and conditions for refixation under fr 22-b. (Para 3) |
| 3. disposal of the petition in terms of established precedent. (Para 4) |
ORDER
This writ petition is filed for the following relief:
“To call for the records relating to the impugned order of 1st Respondent by his proceedings in letter No.11100/Tho.Ka.1(1)/2023-1 dated 15.12.2023, and consequential order of 5th respondent passed revised recovery order by in his letter in Na.Ka.No.3503/A1/2024, dated 19.12.2024 to QUASH the same and consequently directing the Respondents to refund the payment of DCRG, with interest @ 12percent which was recovered by the respondents and sanction the revised pension and other terminal benefits, based on the last pay drawn by the petitioner.
2. Heard the learned counsels on both sides and perused the materials available on record.
3. The issue involved in the present writ petition was earlier considered in a batch of writ petitions in W.P. No. 12275 of 2024 dated 02.03.2026, wherein a similar relief was claimed. The learned Judge after hearing the arguments of both sides and discussing the relevant Rules and Government Orders in detail, had ultimately disposed of the writ petitions with directions. These directions are extracted herein below:
85. In the result, all the writ petitions are disposed of with the following directions:~
i) The impugned order directing the fixation of the selection grade/special grade scale of pay at the first promotional level and 2nd promotional level is set aside to the extent that there shall be no recovery of amount, which has already been paid, from the petitioners ;
ii) Insofar as the petitioners, who have retired from service is concerned, no amount shall be recovered on the basis of the impugned order from the retiral benefits/pensionary benefits of the petitioners with regard to the amount already paid;
iii) Insofar as the petitioners, who are still in service, no amount shall be recovered on the basis of the impugned order from the salary of the petitioners with regard to the amount already paid;
iv) In case any amount has already been recovered from any of the petitioners towards excess payment made in the selection grade scale, the same shall not be refunded to the petitioners and the respondents shall refix the selection grade scale of pay of the said petitioners after amendment to FR 22~B and, thereafter, upon computation, if any amount is due and payable to any of petitioners, the same shall be paid by the respondents forthwith;
v) Until FR 22~B is amended so as to include the directions given in G.O. Ms. No.63305/Pay Cell/2010~1 dated 8.11.2010, more particularly para 4 (i) of the said Government Order, no action shall be taken by the respondents to refix the scale of pay of the petitioners and similarly placed persons;
vi) Subject to amendment, if any, that may be made to FR 22~B, with reference to G.O. Ms. No.63305/Pay Cell/2020~1 dated 8.11.2020, the respondents are at liberty to revise the salary of the persons who are in service by refixing their scales of pay in the selection grade as also the pensionary benefits of the pensioners by refixing their scales of pay in selection grade in line with the amendments that may be made to FR 22~B for computing the admissible pension payable based on para 4 (i) of G.O. Ms. No.63305/Pay Cell/2010~1 dated 8.11.2010, which shall be applicable only prospectively and not retrospectively;
vii) Pursuant to the amendment, if any, made to FR 22~B, upon refixation of the scales of pay of the petitioners, and computing the revised pay that the petitioners who are in service would be entitled to and the revised monthly pension that the retired petitioners would be entitled to, it is made clear that the petitioners would also be entitled for selection grade benefit in the post of HM~MS upon completion of 10 years of se