SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 45182

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT


WP(MD)No.17951, 17374 and 864 of 2023


DATED : 08.04.2026


THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI



W.P.(MD)No.17951 of 2023


Kathir Thilagar ... Petitioner


Vs.


1. The Commissioner of Police, O/o. The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City.


2. The Inspector of Police, B1- Vilakuthoon Police Station, Madurai City.


.... Respondents



W.P.(MD)No.17374 of 2023


Arokiya amali ... Petitioner


Vs.


1. The Commissioner of Police, O/o. The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City.


2. The Inspector of Police, B1- Vilakuthoon Police Station, Madurai City.


.... Respondents



W.P.(MD)No.864 of 2023


Rajesh ... Petitioner


Vs.


1.The Superintendent of Police, O/o. the Superintendent of Police, Viruthunagar District.


2.The Inspector of Police, Srivillipuththur Police Station, Srivillipuththur, Viruthunagar.


3.Rajapandi, The Sub Inspector of Police, Irukkankudi Police Station, Viruthunagar District.


4.Satheesh, Police Constable, Irukkankudi Police Station, Viruthunagar.


5.Uthaya Kumar, Police Constable, Irukkankudi Police Station, Viruthunagar District.


6.The Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009.


7.The Director General of Police, Dr. Radhakrishnan Salai Road, Mylapore, Chennai 600 004.


(R6 and R7 are Suo Motu Impleaded Vide Court Order Dated. 20.08.2024 in Wp(MD). 864/2023)


.... Respondents

Prayer : Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent No.1 to preserve the CCTV footages of respondent No.2 police station and also the CCTV footage fixed in the IDBI Bank on the date of 20.04.2023 at 3.00 am to 20.04.2023 08.00 pm since the amount of Rs.4,90,000 maintained the petitioner in the IDBI Bank Simmakal Branch situated at Madurai District was mishandled and unlawfully seized by respondent No.2 though the petitioner was not a named accused in the Crime No.124 of 2023 dated 15.04.2023 consequently consider the representation sent to the respondent No. 1 dated 14.06.2023.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Mohamed Ali Jinnah

For Respondents : Mr.S.Ravi Additional Public Prosecutor

Prayer : Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent No.1 to preserve the CCTV cameras footages installed in the respondent No.2's police station premises from the date of 10.06.2023 23.00 hrs to 11.06.2023 18.00 hrs in connecting with Crime No.776 of 2023 on the file of the Respondent No.2 by considering the petitioner's representation dated 13.06.2023.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Mohamed Ali Jinnah

For Respondents : Mr.S.Ravi Additional Public Prosecutor

Prayer : Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents No. 2 to preserve the CCTV camera footage in his station from 24.11.2022, 8.00 PM to 25.11.2022, 8.00 AM by considering the representation dated on 29.11.2022.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Mohamed Ali Jinnah

For Respondents : Mr.S.Ravi Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

This Court by order dated 17.12.2024, on the basis of the status report filed by the Joint Secretary of the Government Home Prohibition and Excise Department, dated 28.11.2024, recorded that CCTV system should be set up in the police stations in an unbiased manner, and a sum of Rs.27.25 has also been sanctioned for implementing the installation and upgradation of CCTV systems in two phases across the State. Recording the same, for further report, the case was adjourned.

2. The operative portion of the report dated 13.12.2024 filed by the Joint Secretary of the Home Department, is extracted as follows:

“5. It is submitted that in pursuance of the above direction of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Government in G.O. (D) No.404, Home (Police-12) Department, dated 11.04.2023 have issued orders sanctioning a sum of Rs.38.35 crore 'in principle' for Installation /upgradation of the CCTV system with storage capacity to store footage for a period of 1 year to 18 months in 1567 Police Stations in two phases. The details of two phases are as follows:-

Phase– I a) To replace the Rs.18.00 Crore NVR Setup in 820 Police Stations Rs.18.00 Crore
b) To replace the Analog cameras into IP Cameras and along with storage, UPS, Switch etc., for 251 Police Stations Rs.9.25 crore
Phase – II To replace the all items including enhanced storage facility for 496 Police Stations Rs.11.10 Crore
Total Rs.38.35 Crore

Consequently, the Director General of Police/Head of Police Force, Chennai has been directed to follow the purchase procedure in force and to send necessary proposals to the Government for financial sanction after finalization of purchase procedure.

6. It is submitted that, the Director General of Police, Chennai in his letter dated 12.3.2024 has sent a proposal to the Government and requested to sanction an additional fund to the tune of Rs.7.2 crores and to accord financial sanction for implementation of the following CCTV projects for administrative sanction has already been accorded vide G.O.(Ms.) No.404, Home, (Police-12) Department, dated 11.04.2023.

[[IMG_1]]

7. It is submitted that after examination of the proposal of the Director General of Police / Head of Police Force, Chennai, the Government in G.O.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top