##PAGE1##

W.P.Crl.(MD)No.1884 of 2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED : 06.04.2026

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI

W.P.Crl.(MD)No.1884 of 2026

A.Amalan ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Nagercoil Town,

Kanyakumari District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Asaripallam Police Station,

Kanyakumari District. ... Respondents

PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 16.02.2026 and consequently close the Rowdy History Sheet in H.S.No.5 of 2015 on the file of the third respondent as approved by the second respondent within a time framed to be fixed by this

Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Wins For Respondents : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar

Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

1/8

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 29/05/2026 04:50:51 pm )

W.P.Crl.(MD)No.1884 of 2026

ORDER

This petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondent to

consider the petitioner's representation dated 16.02.2026 and consequently close the Rowdy History Sheet in H.S.No.5 of 2015 on the file of the third respondent as approved by the second respondent within a time framed to be

fixed by this Court.

2. The petitioner has sent a representation on 16.02.2026 to the

respondents seeking to remove his name from the History Sheet No.5 of 2015.

Since the same was not considered, this writ petition is filed.

3. The issue involved in this writ petition has already been dealt with by

the Madurai Bench of this Court and detailed order has been passed in W.P. (MD)No.19651 of 2017 on 26.09.2018. On the basis of the above said Order, the Director General Of Police, Chennai issued a circular in Rc.No.

66569/Crime 3(2)/2019 dated 24.04.2019, which reads as follows :-

“7. From the above judgments the following principles emerge insofar as history sheeters are concerned:

a. In order to facilitate the study of crime and criminals, the Police Standing Orders provides a mechanism, whereby every Police Station shall maintain a crime history, which shall be a confidential record. In this record all cases of crime that are mentioned in PSO

2/8

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 29/05/2026 04:50:51 pm )

W.P.Crl.(MD)No.1884 of 2026

No.742, which provides various classes of crime, shall be entered and even an attempt to commit those offences, are entered in the records

maintained in the Police Station.

b. These crime records maintained by the Various Police Stations shall be reviewed every year by the Inspector of Police of the concerned Police Station. On such review, the Inspector of Police has to furnish a concise appreciation of the year's crime for the benefit of the Superior Officers and also to make suggestions in order to improve the quality of crime control. The review undertaken by the Inspector of Police is not merely a catalogue of the crime in the year. It should reflect the valuable suggestions in order to prevent such crimes in future and to provide ways and means of handling serious

offences in an effective manner.

c. History Sheet can be opened by the concerned Police Station under two circumstances. The first circumstance is provided under PSO No.746, which states that the history sheet can be opened against a person who is a resident (permanently or temporarily) within the station limit, who is known or believed to be addicted to commission of crime, whether convicted or not. Here the thrust is on the habituality or the propensity to commit a crime by a person,

which is sought to be monitored by opening a history sheet.

d. The second category of persons against whom history sheet can be opened are the persons, who are convicted for various offences that has been listed in PSO No.747, wherein opening of the

history sheet is automatic.

e. In the first category of opening history sheet, month wise scrutiny or a