Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Sathish Kumar, Jothiraman, JJ
Sathish Babu – Appellant
Versus
District Collector – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. complaint regarding obstruction of a public path. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court mandate to survey and remove proved encroachments. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN W.P.(MD)No.28497 of 2025 M.G.Sathish Babu ... Petitioner Vs.
1. The District Collector, Madurai District at Madurai.
2. The Tahsildar, Madurai East Taluk, Madurai District.
3. The Block Development Officer, Madurai East Panchayat Union, Madurai District.
4. The Inspector of Police, Karuppayurani Police Station, Madurai District.
5. Pandi ...Respondents PRAYER:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 4 to take immediate and effective action to remove the encroachment (tin-
sheet shed and allied obstructions) put up by the 5th respondent on the 20 feet paver- block public road starting from Thirumohur Kaalikappan Main Road leading to the petitioner's property situated at Survey Nos. 72/4A and 72/5 and to restore the road to its original width and condition within such time as this Court stipulated. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Sathish Babu For Respondents : Mr.B.Saravana
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
