SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 45693

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Sathish Kumar, Jothiraman, JJ
Sathish Babu – Appellant
Versus
District Collector – Respondent
W.P.(MD)No.28497 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sathish Babu
For the Respondents: B. Saravanan, M.P. Senthil, I. Murugesan

The High Court may issue a Writ of Mandamus directing administrative authorities to conduct a survey and remove confirmed encroachments on public roads following due process.

Headnote:The case involves a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus to remove an encroachment on a public road. The petitioner alleged that the fifth respondent erected a tin-sheet shed obstructing a 20-foot public approach road, preventing vehicular movement. The court determined that a formal land survey is necessary to verify the encroachment claims and directed the authorities to act accordingly. The core issue is whether the alleged physical obstruction on a public roadway constitutes an illegal encroachment requiring state intervention. The ratio decidendi rests on the obligation of public authorities to verify land status through due process and take corrective action if illegal obstruction to public pathways is established.

Result: The writ petition is disposed of with directions to the second respondent to conduct a survey and remove any identified encroachment within the stipulated timeframe.

Table of Content
1. complaint regarding obstruction of a public path. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court mandate to survey and remove proved encroachments. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN W.P.(MD)No.28497 of 2025 M.G.Sathish Babu ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The District Collector, Madurai District at Madurai.

2. The Tahsildar, Madurai East Taluk, Madurai District.

3. The Block Development Officer, Madurai East Panchayat Union, Madurai District.

4. The Inspector of Police, Karuppayurani Police Station, Madurai District.

5. Pandi ...Respondents PRAYER:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 4 to take immediate and effective action to remove the encroachment (tin-

sheet shed and allied obstructions) put up by the 5th respondent on the 20 feet paver- block public road starting from Thirumohur Kaalikappan Main Road leading to the petitioner's property situated at Survey Nos. 72/4A and 72/5 and to restore the road to its original width and condition within such time as this Court stipulated. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Sathish Babu For Respondents : Mr.B.Saravanan, Senior Counsel for Mr.M.P.Senthil, Counsel for State for R1 to R3 Mr.I.Murugesan, Govt. Advocate for R4

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.)

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking a direction to respondents 1 to 4 to take immediate and effective action to remove the encroachment (tin-sheet shed and allied obstructions) put up by the 5th respondent on the 20 feet paver- block public road starting from Thirumohur Kaalikappan Main Road leading to the petitioner's property situated at Survey Nos. 72/4A and 72/5 and to restore the road to its original width and condition within such time as this Court stipulated.

2. It is the case of the petitioner that he is in absolute possession and enjoyment of the subject property and there exists a 20 feet paver-block public road starting from Thirumohur-Kaalikappan Main road, leading to the petitioner's property. The third respondent also affirmed the existence of the said 20 feet public road as a common approach road to the lands in the area. However, the 5th respondent has erected a tin-sheet shed and thereby preventing free movement of vehicles. In this regard, the petitioner has also sent representations dated 25.08.2025 and 29.09.2025 to the respondents to remove the encroachment and restore the public road. However, the same were not considered by the respondents till date. Hence, the petitioner has filed this present writ petition.

3. The learned Senior Counsel appearing for the State would submit that the authorities concerned would conduct a survey of the land in question in the presence of all the parties concerned. He further submitted that appropriate action would be taken to remove the encroachment, if any.

4. In such view of the matter, the second respondent is directed to conduct a survey in the place in question, after issuing notice to the petitioner, 5th respondent and all other parties concerned within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If the survey reveals any encroachment, the 2nd respondent shall take necessary action for the removal of such encroachment, after affording sufficient opportunity of personal hearing to all the parties concerned and by following due process of law, within a period of three months thereafter.

5. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of.

There shall be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top