Dhanabalan vs State of Tamilnadu - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 46017

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 46017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. Srimathy, J
Dhanabalan – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamilnadu – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Balamuruganantham R
For the Respondents: E. Antony Sahaya Prabahra

Table of Content
1. summary of the alleged offence leading to the anticipatory bail application. (Para 1 , 2)
2. summary of the prosecution's contention regarding the petitioner's involvement as vehicle owner. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court's decision to grant bail with conditions to ensure investigation integrity. (Para 5 , 6)

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 07/05/2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Dhanabalan ... Petitioner Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep.By, The Inspector of Police, Kalaiyarkovil Police Station,Sivagangai District (In Cr.No.163 of 2026). ... Respondent PRAYER :-

For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.163 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police For Petitioner : Mr. Balamuruganantham R, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.E. Antony Sahaya Prabahra, Additional Public Prosecutor ORDER The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2) BNS, 2023 and Section 21(4) of MMDR Act, 1959 in Crime No.163 of

2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner herein is said to have illegally transported 6 units of gravel s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 46017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASS. Srimathy, JDhanabalan – AppellantVersusState of Tamilnadu – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. Srimathy, J
Dhanabalan – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamilnadu – Respondent