Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.T. Asha, J
Sriganth – Appellant
Versus
Under Secretary to Government – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the petitioner's suspension and subsequent extension of orders. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. contentions regarding the limitation of suspension periods and departmental response. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. legal analysis of suspension expiry rules and impact of governing case law. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. final direction for reinstatement into a non-sensitive post. (Para 11) |
ORDER
The petition has been filed for the following relief;
“calling for records pertaining to the impugned order dated 20.06.2025 vide No.C-14012/16/2025/520 passed by the 2nd respondent and the consequential orders dated 17.09.2025 vide No.C-14012/16/2025, 15.12.2025 vide No.C-14012/16/2025/992 and 09.03.2026 vide No.C-14012/16/2025/1182 passed by the 3rd respondent and quash the same and further, direct the respondents to post him as Assistant in a suitable department by granting all monetary and service benefits.”
2. It is the case of the petitioner that he was appointed as Lower Divisional Clerk and subsequently, got promoted as Assistant in Civil Supplies Department. Later, he was deputed to work as Sub Registrar in the registration department. While so, on 20.06.2025, he was placed under suspe
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
