2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 46190
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Krishnan Ramasamy, J
Sathya – Appellant
Versus
District Collector Namakkal – Respondent
WMP NO. 31932 OF 2022|WMP NO. 31933 OF 2022
Important Points
Subject
Constitutional Law - Writ Petition
Act Referred
Headnote
Issues: The court considered the request for withdrawal based on an endorsement made by the counsel.
Ratio Decidendi: As the party requesting the petition has sought to withdraw the same and filed an endorsement to that effect, the Court sees no impediment in allowing the request.
Result: The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
For the Appellants/Petitioners: A. Prithviraj, R. Nalliyappan
For the Respondents: S. Anitha
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court permits withdrawal of writ petition upon counsel's request. (Para 1 , 2) |
ORDER
When the matter is taken up for hearing today, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2.In view of the submission and the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.