SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 46191

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J
Giridharan – Appellant
Versus
District Revenue Officer – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: R.Sunil Kumar
For the Respondents: S.Anitha

Table of Content
1. summary of events and alleged violation of procedural fairness. (Para 1 , 2)
2. disposal of writ due to expiry of licence. (Para 3)

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated

19.10.2022 passed by the respondent.

2.Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that by virtue of the impugned order, the petitioner’s license for running cracker shop was cancelled without providing opportunity to the petitioner as per Rule 118(3) of the Explosive Rule, 2008. However, the petitioner’s license was expired on

31.03.2024.

3.In view of the above submissions, since the petitioner’s license got expired on 31.03.2024 itself, no order can be passed for restoration of the same. Therefore, the petitioner is directed to make fresh application before the concerned Authority for issuance of fresh license. On receipt of such application from the petitioner, the respondent is directed to consider the same, on merits and in accordance with law.

4.With the aforesaid direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top